Maggie Leppert, NCIL Violence and Abuse Subcommittee
The disability community has banded together to oppose Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the US Supreme Court. One reason for this opposition is Kavanaugh’s 2007 ruling in Doe ex rel. Tarlow v. D.l where he ruled against a group of disabled women who were forced to have elective surgery without their consent, including 2 women who were subjected to non-consensual abortions. Kavanaugh defended his decision by saying “accepting the wishes of patients who lack (and have always lacked) the mental capacity to make medical decisions does not make logical sense.”
Kavanaugh’s decision in this case is an example of state-sponsored reproductive violence, a form of gender-based violence that involves control of a victim’s reproductive systems and choices. Reproductive violence against people with disabilities is perpetuated today through sexual violence, forced sterilization / surgery, adoption restrictions, disparities in access to healthcare and reproductive education, and manipulative use of contraception.
Reproductive violence is a legal, social, and cultural phenomenon. This type of violence against disabled people can be traced back to the eugenics movement. In the early 1900s, in an attempt to eliminate “feeble-minded” populations and curtail “unfit” reproduction, tens of thousands of people with actual or perceived disabilities were forcibly sterilized. Many of these compulsory sterilization laws stayed in place until the 1980s. Today, sterilization for adults and children with disabilities is still common, while the legacy of eugenics lives on in the assumption that disabled lives are seen as inherently sad, easily controllable, and in need of prevention or, even worse, elimination. [Read more…]